Tag: emotion-recognition

2 articles

Policy & Regulation

California bans employers from using AI tools to collect workers' neural data

California Governor Gavin Newsom signed AB 1883 on 30 September 2026, the last day he could act on bills this session. From 1 January 2027 the law, by Assemblymember Isaac Bryan (D-Los Angeles), bars employers from using workplace surveillance tools that use artificial intelligence to collect employees' neural data or to recognise, infer or predict their emotional state. It defines neural data as information generated by measuring activity in an employee's central or peripheral nervous system, covers public as well as private employers, and allows penalties of up to $500 per violation, enforced by the Labor Commissioner and public prosecutors. Tools used to ensure safety, and some federally regulated aerospace and defence work, are exempt. In his signing message Newsom said the law lacks key definitions and asked the Legislature to refine it. Three days earlier he vetoed AB 1542, leaving consumers with an opt-out over the sale of the same category of data.

Oct 2

Policy & Regulation

EU AI Act transparency obligations apply today, high-risk obligations deferred to December 2027

On 2 August 2026, EU AI Act transparency obligations under Article 50 became applicable, requiring emotion-recognition and biometric-categorisation systems to notify natural persons exposed to them. The high-risk obligation suite under Annex III, including conformity assessment and human oversight, was deferred to 2 December 2027 by the Digital Omnibus (Regulation EU 2026/1744) adopted by the Council on 29 June and in force since 27 July 2026. Most compliance framings are conflating the two.

Aug 2