Sunday, August 30, 2026
RSS

Inside BCI

Brain-Computer Interface Industry News
Industry News Research Policy Opinion Market Moves
About Directory Glossary

Tag: state-patchwork

3 articles

Policy & Regulation

California AB 1883 would prohibit employer collection of brain data unless used for safety

California Assemblymember Isaac Bryan's AB 1883, which regulates workplace surveillance including a specific prohibition on employer collection of neural data with a safety-use carve-out, has cleared the Assembly and moved most of the way through the Senate per CalMatters' 10 August 2026 tracking. A parallel Assembly Bill 1542 authored by Assemblymember Christopher Ward would prohibit the sale of neural data. Vermont S.71 (signed 16 June 2026) and H.814 (signed May 2026) are the most recent enacted comparators.

Aug 11

Policy & Regulation

Connecticut and Vermont activate neural data privacy laws on 1 July, taking the US count to five states

Connecticut's Public Act 25-113 (SB 1295), signed by Governor Ned Lamont on 25 June 2025, takes effect on 1 July 2026 and adds 'any information that is generated by measuring the activity of an individual's central nervous system' to the Connecticut Data Privacy Act's sensitive-data category. Vermont's Act 101 (H.814), signed 18 May 2026, takes effect the same day. After 1 July, Colorado, California, Montana, Connecticut and Vermont will all have active neural data privacy law on the books. Connecticut's definition is the narrowest of the five.

Jun 21

Policy & Regulation

Vermont signs H.814 into law, becoming the fifth US state with a neural rights statute

Governor Phil Scott signed H.814 into law on 18 May 2026, making Vermont the fifth US state with neural data privacy legislation on the books after Colorado, California, Montana, and Connecticut. The enacted text is the 6-page version of a bill that originally cleared the House at 32 pages; the consent requirement and private right of action did not survive the Senate amendment process. Effective 1 July 2026.

May 21